Archive for February, 2008

Podcasts and an interview

It’s all my ISP’s fault. If they didn’t offer unlimited subdomains as part of my hosting deal, I wouldn’t have even thought about it. But it was there, after my initial “what the hell am I going to do with a subdomain?” question, bubbling away in my cunning, reptilian brain, filtered by geekgirliness. (That’s copyright me, by the way. I’m hoping it’ll end up as popular as “truthiness”.)

At first, it was only a little step … the carving off of the blog to its own little empire. Then, as I started to struggle with putting the podcast on feed from my main site, it all became too difficult, and a voice said to me: say, why not create another subdomain for the podcasts? This, I have done. Behold, it is here. I’m still working on getting all three domains inter-related, which is going to be a major pain if I have any major updates I’m contemplating, but it should mean easier access for you to my various bits and pieces. You are worth it, aren’t you?

So that was my punishment for the past couple of days — creating the podcast site. Now, it’s your turn. After that wonderful review of Combat! from Maria Zannini, she is interviewing me at her blog. It was a great interview and I had a lot of fun, so I hope you enjoy it too! Thank you, Maria; you’re a great friend.

Summary for today:

Maria interviews me: mariazannini.blogspot.com
My main website: www.ksaugustin.com
My blog (here, that is): blog.ksaugustin.com
My podcast: radiofreebliss.ksaugustin.com

I’m in search of a medicinal scotch next.

Going loony

** Because ‘Back to the Future’ was a tad too obvious. **

The moon was back in the news this past week so I thought I’d blog about that, rather than my regular scheduled topic. The attention is due to Google’s $30m Lunar X prize, and yes I’m referring to that Google. It sounds like a lot, but US$30 million is a pittance for the giant of search engines when you think of all the attendant publicity that’s going to occur in the next few years. Hmmmm, starting to get a bit snarky, aren’t I? Okay. According to the prize’s website, the money goes to the the team who manages to:

land a privately funded robotic craft on the Moon that is capable of roaming the lunar surface for at least 500 meters [sic] and [send] video, images and data back to Earth.

Before I continue, let me take you back to … oh, let’s say 1966. What was the world’s state of play in that year? Well,

  • India and Pakistan sign a peace agreement (but neglected to tackle Kashmir … an opportunity lost)
  • the United States of America was still involved in the Vietnam War
  • Robert Menzies had just resigned as Prime Minister of Australia
  • Ian Smith still governed Rhodesia

All those things set the time clearly for me, but are all political aren’t they? Let’s see if I can find something else:

  • PanAm is still a viable US airline
  • Hewlett-Packard releases its very first computer
  • IBM releases DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory). Yes, the precursor of all that RAM you read about in PCs nowadays
  • The world’s first effective rubella vaccine is introduced
  • Andrew Warhol is still alive
  • The Beatles were still together (Yellow Submarine album)

The following books were released:

  • The Comedians by Graham Greene
  • The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein
  • A Dream of Africa by Camara Laye
  • Rocannon’s World by Ursula K le Guin
  • The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon
  • The Thirty-First Floor by Per Wahlöö

and the following TV shows had just started:

  • Batman (the Adam West version)
  • Star Trek (Classic, with William Shatner)
  • also The Green Hornet (with Bruce Lee), The Monkees, and Mission Impossible (the original series)

Okay, got the picture? (The snapshot is thanks to reading at Answers.com, by the way.) Why am I harping on 1966? Because that’s the year Luna 9 landed on the Moon and sent back postcards (five black-and-white stereoscopic panorama photos of the lunar surface).

The mention of the Lunar X prize gives me the opportunity to correct a few misconceptions that have been bugging me for a while. It was the Soviets, not the Americans, who put the first man-made object on the moon, way back in 1959 (Luna 2), just as they put the first probe into Earth’s orbit in 1957 (Sputnik), and just as they put the first man into space in 1961. Everybody knows about Yuri Gagarin, but it really is troubling that the space programme of the Soviets (developed without the kind of help from, as Jon Stewart once put it, the “ageing Nazi scientists” that the USA had) has somehow been forgotten.

The Soviets had a very healthy and successful lunar exploration programme that began in the late 1950s and went right through to 1976, centred primarily around … tell me if this sounds familiar … self-contained robotic probes. And now, almost 50 years — or, half a CENTURY — later, we’re trying to replicate that?! Doesn’t it all sound a bit retrogressive to you? Surely after five decades of technological advance, we should be a teenier step further along the space exploration timeline?

The answer in this particular case is, of course, political will. For both empires’ space programmes, the 1970s (for various reasons) spelt the death-knell for lunar habitats and all that kind of space-geek candy. If there’s anything that so starkly illustrates the way human will trumps technology, it’s the space programme. Likewise, whenever I hear about a “ground-breaking technological advance that will change the very way we live”, I always try delving into the human factors behind it … like the ageing baby boomer generation and Viagra. Yeah, couldn’t see that one coming (no pun intended). * snicker * The human factors determine the technology, which then determines other, consequent, human factors. But the human factor was there first … always is.

So now we have those factors coming into play again (Google, fame, sense of romance, entrepreneurship, government apathy) and we’re back to where we were HALF A CENTURY AGO (just in case you’d forgotten). Oh joy. Can’t wait. Be still my racing heart, etc. etc.

POSTSCRIPT: A great book on the invisible topic of the Soviet space programme is Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration by Brian Harvey. We have it in our library.

Backups? Don’t talk to me about backups!

I know what you’re thinking. You’re sitting there, shaking your head, saying to yourself, “Oh no. I know where that blog title came from. Poor Kaz had a run-in with her machine and something got deleted and she didn’t have a backup. Oh dear. I wonder how much she lost? I wonder how long it will take to recover?”

That’s what you thought, wasn’t it? Go on, be honest. Well, you’re not quite right. Actually, you’re completely wrong and I have the exact opposite problem. You see, dear readers, I have kept too many backups. Let me explain.

I have what I think is a great, solid science-fiction romance called War Games (WG). It actually grew from something I read on the Smart Bitches site early last year; to whit, while there are a lot of gay romances around, where are the lesbian ones? Click here for the link. In the Comments, I said I’d take up the challenge (on behalf of the more mainstream romance community … I’m not here to say there isn’t great lesbian s-f around … look at Ursula K leGuin and Joanna Russ, for example) and write a lesbian space opera novella and submit it to a publisher by the end of 2007. And Keziah Hill said she’d remind me. Well that didn’t happen (the finishing and submitting thing … and the reminding thing, come to think about it) but, in my defence, the story just kept growing until it’s now a full-sized novel (er, kinda sorta 80+K words, for reasons that will become obvious anon).

So, here I am in February 2008, editing WG (as I do with anything that hasn’t sold yet) and, as I get to the end of my first recent round of edits, I get the feeling that I’ve expanded on some of the stuff before. And where is that passage I’m sure I wrote? And didn’t I include more description for this bit here? I mean, my memory is a bit flaky at times, but I don’t often forget pivotal scenes I’ve written for a current wip. So, riven by frustration, I started trawling back through my backups. Well, in an effort to be as paranoid about my work as possible, I put backups everywhere — on my two machines, on my thumbdrive, on my SD card, squirrelled with my ebook library (another SD card), on the home network drive, on a bigger external portable drive. Geez, it seemed the only place I hadn’t put it was on J’s work computer! And, to complicate matters, there were multiple backups at each location! So guess what? I had to go through all those backup directories, opening up each incarnation of WG, and checking a particular part of the manuscript for a scene I know I wrote, but couldn’t quite remember when. That has taken me a week.

And I found it. The problem is, it’s not the version I’ve just spent several weeks editing. So now I have two versions of WG, each edited to approximately the same level, but each of them subtly different. Added to that is the added frustration of having the formatting of one all over the place because I migrated from Microsoft Word to OpenOffice Writer late last year and, despite editing, the version I opened still had wonky fonts all over the place. (Word must put some sticky bits in the document that can’t be removed by just changing the style, which is what I did the first time around.) I think I had to cut out and retype the offending text in full before the wonkiness disappeared in my ‘other’ version of WG; it’s damned annoying. Which wouldn’t be so bad except the wonkiness throws the pages out of alignment. Oh no, no quick scan between versions, comparing rough positions of paragraphs against each other. With the formatting gone up the wazoo, it’s got to be a line-by-line exercise. Why don’t I adjust the formatting? Because that, unfortunately, would be a line-by-line exercise as well and on an older edited version to boot.

Look, I know I shouldn’t be complaining. I looked for a backup file and I found it. It could have been worse. I could have lost those extra 10,000 words and been desolate for weeks. But I’m just so frustrated at having to merge two manuscripts. Aw, what the heck. Who am I kidding? Underneath that irritation, I’m really pleased as punch. Ask any writer, and she’ll tell you that finding 10,000 extra words of usable work is like finding gold. Better, ‘cos you can start using it straight away. Just a word of advice to other paranoid writers, however — it may be best to perhaps restrict your backup options to only three devices and to use a grandfathering technique of versions rather than keeping the entire damn Genesis “and Abraham beget Isaac, and Isaac beget …” line of snapshot directories in each place. (I had up to 17! writing directories! in each! location! Yikes!)

FURTHER THOUGHTS: Just ask me; I’ll write the most UNpopular romances ever. Ellora’s Cave doesn’t accept f/f anymore? No problems, Kaz will write it anyway. Readers say m/m really floats their boat but f/f is meh? Again, no problem, Kaz will write one anyway. Brain like mush much? On the flip side, I think I have a good story in WG. And I think I’ve done a fair job of eliciting sympathy for Cheloi and Garza and the difficulties of their romance, regardless of the fact that they just happen to be two women. I just hope I eventually find a publisher who thinks so too. Wish me luck.

Blog to our new cooktop…no, really!

I was flicking through a recent issue of Wired magazine and noted that one of their coolest geek toys was a standalone tabletop induction cooktop panel that you could pick up for a mere US$1400. Induction cooking is very cool. You can turn on the hotplate and put your hand on it and, as long as you’re not wearing iron-based jewellery (I wasn’t going to chance it while wearing my wedding band, tbh), the plate will feel cool. Yet, put a saucepan of cold water on the same plate and it will boil within 30 seconds. I remember a vivid ad which showed an egg, half on the induction hotplate, the other half in a cross-sectioned saucepan. The half in the saucepan was frying nicely while the half that was slopped on the hotplate remained raw. This side-effect (the hotplate not the saucepan) has the further advantage of being easy to clean because no food ‘cooks’ on the hotplate, and I’m all for lazy cooking.

The way induction works has to do with magnetic fields and electrical resistance, so I won’t go through it here. (I know, I really am restraining myself! Aargh, losing battle … electricity is used to set up a magnetic field which causes heat due to resistance within the non-pure base of the iron-based saucepan. And that’s all I’m saying.) However, I will show you our cooktop.

Isn’t it a beauty? How could we not buy one? It even lights up with flashing blue LEDs when the power is on and I’m a sucker for flashing blue LEDs. Akira is a local Singapore brand, which explains why it was cheaper than the usual Japanese imports. During the Chinese New Year sale at a local Carrefour store, we paid SG$109 for it. And included with the hob was a saucepan with glass lid. That works out to about US$76 or EUR52 for the set. And the speed of cooking is blinding, much faster even than gas. So fast, in fact, that prep work is essential.

Of course there’s always a downside: my earthenware pots — not containing any iron — can’t be used with induction cooking, and neither can my Pyrex dishes. And the hotplate has questionable value for a wok. Also, aluminium/aluminum pans can’t be used either. This is not a problem for us, because most of our cookware is cast-iron or the heavy-bottomed steel-copper type, but it may be a problem for you, so check your cookware and review your cooking habits first if you’re thinking of investing in this energy-efficient über-cool gadget.

When we finally move to a place of our own, I’ll be bugging J for an induction/gas hybrid cooktop. But I don’t think I’ll have to do too much persuading because he’s sold on it too. And did I tell you that, because of its energy efficiency, the electricity bills will be lower? Win-win for safety, clean-up and money. And that’s exactly the way I like it.

UPDATE: In the interests of good science, I put my wedding-band hand on a working induction plate set to boil water. Y’know, there’s always that conflict between rationality (my wedding ring is gold, which should not contain any iron compounds, therefore it will not heat up) versus emotion (put my hand on a hotplate that can boil water in less than 30 seconds?! Are you crazy?!). I’m happy to report that my hand, and ring, survived intact. Ah, the things I do for my readers.

FURTHER WARNING: While the hotplate remains cool until something iron-based is put on it, the plate retains the heat of the saucepan after it’s done. While heat dissipation is quick, the plate is hot after cooking. Or, to put it another way, if you don’t believe me and want to try the hand-on-the-hotplate trick for yourself, do it before you begin cooking, not after, or you may get a nasty burn.

No CAPA but fun in Geekdom

Well, I didn’t win a Psyche (that was my category at the CAPAs) BUT I lost to Joy Nash and her book Deep Magic. Joy just happens to be a best-selling USA Today author so, all in all, I’m not feeling too bad. Congratulations Joy!

The subject of interest in ITlandia at the moment is the bid by Microsoft Corporation (the lumbering, myopic rhinoceros, perhaps) for Yahoo (the injured, undernourished gazelle), with Google as the stalking cheetah following the hunt across the savannah. In a recent news item from the San Jose Mercury News, the Good Morning Silicon Valley section (via their email newsletter) had this to say:

In an internet moment, retired advertising executive Roy Bostock was thrust in the middle of a high-stakes Silicon Valley drama. Minutes after he was appointed Yahoo’s chairman Jan. 31, Microsoft phoned with its takeover offer.

Minutes after? Do you wonder how that phone conversation went?

MS: Good morning, I’d like to speak to your chairman please?
YH: May I ask who’s calling?
MS: Microsoft Corporation.
YH: Yeah right, and I’m Albert Einstein. Piss off, you freak!

or

MS: May I speak with Terry Semel please?
YH: I’m sorry, Mr Semel is no longer with the company.
MS: Oh well, whoever is Chairman nowadays. And make it pronto!

or even

MS: May I speak with Roy Bostock please?
YH: I’m sorry, we have no Mr Bostock working for our company.
MS: Of course you do, you moron, he’s the new Chairman. Jeez, no wonder we’re trying to take you over!

I wonder, too, if there are codewords that business owners use to identify that they’re bona fide billionaires, instead of one of the great unwashed masses pranking in their spare time.

AP: Hi, I’d like to talk to Steve Ballmer.
MS: I’m afraid Mr Ballmer is–
AP: The ice moves swiftly when salty.
MS: Oh, hold on a minute Mr Jobs, and I’ll put you straight through.

And how would a retired advertising executive, no less, deal with a call from Microsoft, offering $31 per Yahoo share? “Yeah, whatever sweetheart. Look, why don’t you get your people to call my people and we’ll set up lunch, say, next Tuesday? You eat Italian? I love Italian. If we’re lucky, I’ll get Tiger Woods to join us. We completed a great campaign with him for steel-reinforced jockey shorts before I left Scratchy and Scratchy.” It’s hard to know who would be more stunned by such a conversation.

So that’s the way my mind works when the truth was actually a lot more prosaic. Co-founder of Yahoo, Jerry Yang, got a call from Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer, and that’s when the offer was made.

JY: (phone rings) Hi, this is Jerry.
SB: Jerr, this is Steve. Steve Ballmer. How are ya, pal?
JY: Great Steve, and you?
SB: Fine. Fine. How’re the kids? And the wife?
JY: Oh you know, ticking over. What about you?
SB: Oh same ole, same ole. What about those 49ers, eh?
JY: (chuckles) Yeah. Say, I’m taking the Gulfstream down to Atlanta to catch a game next month. Care to join me?
SB: Sure. Just let me know when, in case it clashes with my regular poker night.
JY: I’ll get my PA to confirm with yours.
SB: Great. Looking forward to it. Say, since I’ve got you on the line…

The Valley being a small place, these guys probably bump into each other at Fry’s every other week, and they’ve probably got each other’s private mobile number on speed-dial. But it’s still nice to muse on hypotheticals …

A review for COMBAT! and getting rid of excerpts

If there’s one thing I’ve learnt in my life, it’s that you have to listen to your end-users. It holds in every facet of your life where you’re providing a service, whether it’s scheduling training for a product, or promoting a book to your readers. I lurk at a lot of sites and probably don’t post half as much as various promotion guides tell me I should, but that doesn’t mean I’m not there, taking it all in and ruminating on whether readers are right or not.

Sometimes I think they’re not. Readers keep saying that they want to try different things but then how do you go on to explain 10 million+ books sold by Cassie Edwards? Or 1 billion+ books sold by Barbara Cartland? (No, that’s not a typo, I got it from her website.) On the other hand, readers also say they don’t like excerpts, because the author can cherrypick a passage that’s not representative of the book, thus selling it under false pretences. Okay, that one has a point. So, because I believe that the relationship between author and reader should be as straightforward as possible, I’ve deleted all the excerpts from my website and have put up first chapters instead. The entire first chapter. That should give you an idea of how I write and should be a fairer representation of what’s in each release.

And, speaking of releases, Maria Zannini has a review of COMBAT! on her blog. It is a generous and gracious review and I’m not quite sure what to say, especially after I thought I bored her to tears in one of our recent exchanges, after she initiated a flood of nostalgia on my part. Her reply to my meandering was a pithy summary of a wonderful future romance plot so, if I get around to writing it, Maria, I’ll have you to thank for it!

She’s taking questions too, so if you have something to ask regarding COMBAT!, or writing in first-person, or anything else, head on over and log your comment. I’ve promised to stop by and reply to any queries posted.

Throwing identity around with abandon

There was a bit of a tempest in Singapore recently, with some anonymous Internet poster threatening to print the identity details of all/many foreign workers in Singapore. This is the result of common resentment in this country, where foreign workers are reviled because they take jobs from Singaporeans. It doesn’t matter that it’s the government that sets policy, the average Singaporean — bereft of many liberties — strikes out at the first person s/he sees, and that is the foreigner.

The identity details that were printed however were interesting. They included the name, place of birth, identity numbers, birthdate and current address of the foreigner. And, also interestingly, only Asian (non-white) foreigners were targetted, thus indicating a lack of … what’s the word? ah yes … balls on the part of the poster.

I didn’t take much notice, because the kind of information posted is the kind that every sales clerk in the country is privy to. It seems that you can’t even pay for something in Singapore without having to produce your passport, and who knows how many databases all this information is being written to? This was brought especially home to me when I was filling out the warranty form for a small appliance we’d bought and it asked for my identification number. I mean, what are the chances of another KS Augustin fradulently taking her broken Brand X kettle to the manufacturer to get it fixed? Am I expected to have my passport examined and photocopied ad nauseam just to get an element exchanged under warranty? … Well, yes, I suppose I am.

Lest you be sitting there and chortling at my misfortune, I’d like to direct you to a recent article in The Register. In a nutshell, British banks are rolling out a new type of RFID-enabled card (backed by Visa and Mastercard) called Paywave, that will not require authorisation for any transactions less than GBP10. Now, here’s a question for the class — how many people think that’s a bad idea? As you can see, my hand is up.

Information on items that use RFID technology are notoriously easy to pick up (that’s the whole idea) and the usual so-called encryption algorithms used by companies/the government are notoriously easy to crack. So, to bring this down to the level of reality, there is nothing stopping some grey/black hat from sitting on a bench somewhere, accessing your card from metres away and throwing a couple of GBP9.99 transactions on it. Of course, that’s just peanuts to the committed cracker. If the encryption codes can be cracked, then there are hundreds of identities swarming around that bench every hour, beaming their information into the ether, just waiting to be exploited, leaving the hapless victim with decades of frustration and angst in an effort to clear up his/her affairs after an attack of identity theft. I know of this to a lesser extent, because someone I knew was burgled (pre-internet banking days) and, more than 20 years later, he is still trying to clear his name and prove he didn’t defraud various businesses to the tune of thousands of dollars. Nowadays, you don’t even have to physically touch a possession of your victim’s … you just pluck the intel from the air.

Here’s the thing I can’t understand. Presumably, the world has become a more dangerous place. Yet every major institution, from governments to banks to retail shops, are coming up with more and more insecure ways of throwing our identity around. Whether we’re talking about easily-cracked technologies, or giving every untrained, security-unconscious clerk and his/her dog the ability to openly photocopy and transcribe your personal information, the ‘initiatives’ from these major institutions open the door to widescale identity abuse, not close them.

Which brings up an interesting question. Assuming that: (a) the world has become more dangerous, and (b) the institutions that have told us this are also making our identities less secure, what is the end goal in cases of inevitable infraction? Will justice be served … or will a judicious serve of scapegoating suffice? Hmmmmm …

RADIO FREE BLISS is here!

I know, I was really slack because I should’ve blogged yesterday. However, I was a bit busy doing other things … like finalising the first edition of the Radio Free Bliss podcast! And it’s now available.

Get it here!

I mentioned several authors and sites on the podcast. In rough order of appearance, they are:

Eppie Awards : www.epicauthors.com/eppies.html
The Romance Studio : www.theromancestudio.com
Preditors & Editors poll : www.critters.org/predpoll/tally.html
Total-E-Bound : www.total-e-bound.com
Dayna Hart : www.daynahart.com
Samhain Publishing : www.samhainpublishing.com
Maya Reynolds blog : mayareynoldswriter.blogspot.com
Karyna da Rosa : www.karyna-online.com
Carol Lynne : www.carol-lynne.net
EDIT: And how could I have forgotten Just Erotic Romance Reviews : www.justeroticromancereviews.com

I hope you enjoy the podcast. Any feedback gratefully received.

What it’s all about, Alfie?

I had great difficulty getting to sleep last night. So J and I lay in the dark, listening to the night noises outside, and discussing things. In the mornings, we usually discuss politics. I hit my news sources, he hits his, and we share our insights and the latest developments over tea and coffee. At night however, we tend to discuss more personal things, which is much more relaxing that arguing foreign policy in the Middle East or domestic policy in Poland (which will often have us running to gather corroborating references).

J started it all by asking what on earth I meant by including a review of Toer’s The Fugitive on the blog. It had nothing to do with either science-fiction, technology, romance, life in Singapore, or the kids, and it probably wouldn’t garner a single comment. I did it, I told him, because I thought it was important. People tend to think of their own communities as the only ones that can feel happy, sad, betrayed, hurt, torn. I wanted to present a different perspective. Of course it’s coloured by the fact that I come from this locale myself, but it’s vitally important, I said, for people to understand that everyone in the world has the same hopes and fears as everyone else. And exposing Toer’s first work on my blog (as insignificant as it is) was my way of trying to show that … as well as introduce some local writing to the population at large. Toer is dead, but there are many other Asian writers out there and I will review them, and write about them, in the future.

Then morning came, and I went to my friend Maria’s blog, and she had a quiz up: ‘Which Fantasy/Sci-Fi Character Are You?’. And I did it, because I’m a sucker for quizzes, and the answer was personally profound because it encapsulates my entire philosophy so elegantly.

Jean-Luc Picard

Which Fantasy/SciFi Character Are You?

An accomplished diplomat who can virtually do no wrong, you sometimes know it is best to rely on the council of others while holding the reins.

[My emphasis follows because, gosh darn, these words have never been more important as they are now:] There are some words which I have known since I was a schoolboy. “With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.” These words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie — as a wisdom, and warning. The first time any man’s freedom is trodden on, we’re all damaged.

Jean-Luc is a character in the Star Trek universe. This The Next Generation fan site has an outline of his career.

Yeah, it may all be pop psychology but, as Maria says, I’ll take it!

Review: The Fugitive by Pramoedya Ananta Toer

cover of The Fugitive

Being a post-colonial, post-WWII, post-Japanese-wanted-to-eradicate-my-race-because-Eurasians-are-not-of-pure-blood child, the one label that strikes a chord with me, more than the vilest swear word you can think of, is ‘collaborator’. As much as I like to pride myself on my ability to see multiple sides to any story, I was very black-and-white when it came to collaborators. They were/are scum. End of story.

Until, that is, I picked up a copy of The Fugitive by Toer. By any definition, Pramoedya Ananta Toer was a true Indonesian patriot. That is, every action of his (mostly literary and as an educator) was geared towards the betterment of the Indonesian people as a whole. He was against the Dutch exploitation of his country, the Java-centric view of the independent government, and the discrimination of the Indonesian Chinese. And, although he died in 2006, he taught me that — like life — collaboration is also mired in grey.

The Fugitive takes place over one evening and the following day — the eve and day of the Japanese surrendering in WWII, and follows the steps of Hardo, a renowned resistance leader who will not rest until the Japanese have given up. He can feel the winds of change as he visits his home village of Kaliwangan, but the inhabitants of the village still believe the Japanese are unbeatable, and they have each come to some internal agreement within themselves on how they cope with the situation.

Hardo’s mother has died in the time since he became a rebel. Hardo’s father, once head of the village, was stripped of his title and spends his time gambling, as an escape from a life he refuses to face. Hardo was engaged, and his future father-in-law is the new village chief who — while trying to engineer the best outcome for himself and his daughter, Ningsih — ends up being a catalyst for disaster. Ningsih, Hardo’s fiancee, is the most faithful of all, still waiting for Hardo’s return, patient and gentle. Even more than the Japanese, the ostensible, mostly hidden, enemy in the book is Karmin, Hardo’s best friend, who continued serving with the Japanese rather than rebel against them in a failed coup as Hardo and two of his companions did. Hardo’s rebel friends and the villagers themselves want to kill Karmin because they view him as a traitor, but Karmin’s story is not as simple as that, even as he acknowledges the label, and Hardo, rightly, does not believe in Karmin’s unadulterated evil.

The short novel, Toer’s first I believe, is very readable. Its style is more oral rather than written, in much the same way as Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot is really meant to be watched and heard rather than read. And, like Godot, the story takes place over a short period of time. Complex concepts and situations are presented in clear and simple language, giving the reader plenty food for thought amid the storyteller-type repetition. This is probably the best piece of advice I can give a prospective reader. The Indonesians have always had a very strong oral tradition, and The Fugitive, although written, feels more like a tale being woven by a storyteller to a young audience at night. There are no deep characterisations (to my disappointment), but the language is soothing and evocative. Any interpretation of motive and emotion are left completely to the listening reader. This is more a play than a novel which, I think, is why I was so forcefully reminded of Godot as I read it.

The dilemma facing the Indonesian people on the eve of WWII was never an easy one. Was it better to support a cruel colonial power (the Dutch) or put their trust in the Japanese promise of the East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere? Many, like Toer himself, initially supported the Japanese because they saw such support as the only viable route to an independent Indonesia but, as the atrocities of the Japanese became more evident, more Indonesians turned against them, like Hardo and his friends, Dipo and Kartiman. Fleeing the threat of summary decapitation, they melted into the burgeoning beggar population, biding their time, moving around and living off scraps. In one of my favourite passages, the new village chief (and future father-in-law) meets Hardo (who is fasting until Karmin approaches him and asks his forgiveness for betraying their cause) on the outskirts of the village. This is near the beginning of the book:

‘Are you able to manage in the condition you’re in?’
‘Yes.’
‘You are? That, I do not understand at all.’ The old man spoke as if to a child. ‘When you go to the city you see children sprawled lifeless at the side of the road. In front of the market and the stores, down beneath the bridge, on top of garbage heaps and in the gutters there are corpses. Nothing but corpses. The place is filled with the dead–children and old people. And you know what they do? If they’re going to die, before they take their final breath, they first gather together a pile of teakwood or banana leaves that have been used to wrap food in. And they cover their bodies with those leaves and then they die. It’s like they know that in two hours they’re going to die and that after they’re dead no one is going to prepare them for burial. These are crazy times we’re going through. And I don’t know why it is. In all my life this is the first time I’ve seen anything like it. Corpses. Wherever you go, unattended corpses. Come home, Hardo.’
‘Thank you but no.’ Hardo discounted the old man’s plea.
‘No one will betray you.’

But of course he does.

I am eager to read more of Toer’s work, and think I’ll hunt down The Mute’s Soliloquy next. This is a collection of essays and unsent letters to his family that he wrote while imprisoned at the penal colony of Buru island for eleven years without charge. For me, as a post-colonialist, Toer’s work is thought provoking and disturbing but, then again, most true education is.

The Fugitive is available in most bookstores through the Penguin imprint.