Archive for October, 2008

  • Ranty McRant: Cooking programmes

    0

    Do you know one of things J and I do to relax? We put on episodes of Julia Child and Jacques Pepin to watch on TV. If we think we’ve seen them a bit too often, we put on some Rick Stein just to mix things up a bit. And we’re even warming to Jamie Oliver. You can safely say we like food. But if there’s one thing I’m getting a bit too much of, it’s the stupid pronouncements of every celebrity “chef” out there.

    Bear in mind, that I love/adore cooking, and have done for more than 2 decades. We have hundreds of cookbooks on our bookshelves. I can watch an episode of “Iron Chef” and criticise them because they didn’t remove the pistils from courgette flowers before frying them, or because they believe pizza pie originated in Italy.

    So, as an exercise, let’s see if you can spot this incidence of repetitive inanity.

    Did you know that the traditional cuisine of northern Italy depends on fresh ingredients, sourced locally? And that the traditional cuisine of China depends on fresh ingredients, sourced locally? How about the traditional cuisine of Mexico? Fresh ingredients, sourced locally. Having absorbed all that, can you tell me … what the traditional cuisines of south-east Asia depended on? Go on, give it a shot. Got it? Yep, they depended on freakin’ fresh ingredients, sourced freakin’ locally! Would never have guessed that one, Anthony Bourdain!

    Is that all these people can say nowadays? Who are the vacuous clones writing this rubbish? I lift my eyebrow disdainfully as I stare at the TV screen. “So you’re saying there were no Concorde flights transporting white truffles in oil halfway across the world back in the fourteenth century, then?” With an entire region’s cooking repetoire to choose from, are the phrases “fresh ingredients” and “sourced locally” really the only things one can think of?

    Because God hates me(*), I was also subjected to a dreadful series called “Sugar”, where some bimbo concocts nouveau yuppie food in an ersatz house setting that makes Ikea catalogue photos look cosy and traditional. And do you know what she said when preparing a sweet pastry base for a pie? “Prick the bottom of the pastry with a fork or it will spread when it bakes in the oven.”

    I almost fell off the sofa. It will spread? We’re talking pastry here, woman, not chocolate. And, in fact, pastry has a tendency to shrink when it’s baked. Good gods! It was oh-so-obvious that this woman — who stands in front of a camera, being paid an obscene amount of money to teach people how to make the equivalent of twee canapes — had never cooked a goddamned pie in her life. Because, gentle reader, if she had, she would know that one pricks the bottom (and sides) of fresh pastry to stop layers of pastry ballooning up/out and filling the pie cavity. I know this because I’ve cooked dozens of pies and it’s happened to me. But this woman can — either through stupidity or ignorance — stand there under a cloak of authority, collect a fat fee and lie through her back teeth over, not just one but two, facts. I wouldn’t mind so much, except some newbie is going to take this piece of drivel as gospel and live a life filled with culinary falsehood. (I take food very seriously.)

    I can understand that cooking programmes are chic, and that various producers are falling over themselves to come up with the next biggest name. But could somebody please think of the words they’re putting in these people’s mouths? Just to help me regain my composure, I’ll finish with one of Julia’s priceless comments:

    How much garlic you add depends on how you feel about garlic

    Amen, Julia. We still need people like you around.

    (*) Actually, S/He doesn’t. We have a cordial agreement, God and I … I don’t bother The Supreme Being; The Supreme Being doesn’t bother me.

  • Catherine Lundoff at Radio Free Bliss

    0

    Even though I didn’t blog on Friday (sorry, decided to make a long weekend of it, what with the Deepavali public holiday on Monday), that didn’t mean I wasn’t busy.

    Behold, a new interview on the Radio Free Bliss site. This time it’s Catherine Lundoff and — considering she has over 60 stories, articles and essays to her name — it was a bit of a challenge trying to decide what to ask her and what to leave out. Catherine has been a Gaylactic Spectrum Award finalist in both 2005 and 2008, has a terrific sense of humour, and … well, for the rest of it, you’ll just have to listen to the interview.

    We discuss genre fiction and erotica, Minneapolis, the use of ice in the creative process. All the usual author stuff. In a twist, though, Catherine also edited a themed anthology this year. I asked for the Number One Tip for writers thinking of submitting to anthologies, so if you want to find out what it is, you’ll just have to go over to the Bliss site.

    In other geeky news, I’m now running Compiz on top of KDE 4 on my machine. It’s sweet, although there seems to be a bug where Compiz mashes all my screens on the one workspace when I click back onto it from a different workspace. I like that my wallpaper changes every 10 minutes (a KDE feature) and, with the way I work, the customisable opacity of the windows (also KDE) is more a utility for me than a decoration, although it looks way cool as well.

    Meanwhile, J is not so happy. Used to Unix systems, he expects each of his workspaces to be completely unique, right down to what apps are available on the Desktop, and is terribly disappointed that all workspace desktops are the same. I know it’s a slim hope, but if anyone can suggest a Linux-type AMD64-compatible distro that will deliver unique workspace configurations, please leave a comment. Having given Fedora 9 a spin (solid; yum configuration is not so obvious to Fedora n00bs), we’re about to install Kubuntu‘s Intrepid Ibex on one of his machines to see how that looks.

    Oh, and if the Metisse guys could get their act together and code/test/package Metisse for KDE 4 (the Compiz mashups are starting to peeve me), that would be awesome. I’d help out, but I left my coding days behind me many many many years ago.

  • Ranty McRant: Words, words, words

    0

    As you well know by now, gentle reader, I am not ideologically conservative. In fact, I’m somewhat left of centre, as they say in polite circles. I am used to being called a “bleeding heart”, “commie”, “pinko scum”, and other affectionate appellations. They come with the territory. (Good practice for being a writer, as a matter of fact. Helps build up the ole rhino hide and whatnot.) But what really riles me at the moment, is the bandering about of the term “socialism” for every ill of the capitalist system.

    And, make no mistake, with the current financial crisis, we are talking about a HUGE collapse of confidence in financial systems due to FREE MARKET, UNREGULATED, CAPITALIST strategies. Sorry to have to put all that in boldface, but I think it’s appropriate that people think on that for a bit. When we talk about Cuba or spoke about the former Soviet Union, the terms used are/were invariably the ills associated with “communist regimes”. However, now that we’re talking about the meltdown of finance and a looming global recession (I’ve been following Roubini), it’s “banks” and “financial systems” that are mentioned, not the ills associated with “capitalist regimes”. And, make no mistake, we’re talking regimes here. Definition please, Ms. Dictionary:

    regi’me, n. method of government; prevailing system of things.

    But, of course, we can’t use that term, can we? It’s “communist/repressive regimes” and “capitalist democracies”. As if, by opposing bailouts of banks who should have known better, you’re somehow also, ipso facto, against democracy. Keep your eyes open next time you peruse a paper and tell me I’m wrong.

    So, that’s the first quibble: an unequitable distribution of emotion-laden nouns and adjectives. The second is the use of the term “socialism”. How did it come about that rich, white guys managed to talk their friends in government (*) into (1) getting rid of all regulation regarding leverage limits on lendings, and then — when it all went pear-shaped — (2) convince the US Treasury to hand over a minimum of US1.3 trillion to keep themselves in business, and have the newspapers and various politicians call it “socialism“???? It beggars the mind. Shouldn’t we, instead, be calling it a thieving conspiracy? The rise again of the Robber Barons? Extortion? Laziness? Greed? Irresponsibility? But, no, the term that sticks to the wall is “socialism”.

    Well, I’m a socialist, and I don’t approve the use of that term in that context. Especially as Noam Chomsky points out in a recent essay in the Irish Times:

    Such interventionism [where narrow sectors are calling for massive state intervention to rescue collapsing financial institutions] is a regular feature of state capitalism [my very decided emphasis].

    Chomsky goes on to say that:

    A study by international economists Winfried Ruigrok and Rob van Tulder 15 years ago found that at least 20 companies in the Fortune 100 would not have survived if they had not been saved by their respective governments …. Such government intervention “has been the rule rather than the exception over the past two centuries”, they conclude [again, my tedious emphasis].

    Get it? It’s capitalism in a non-democratic environment that’s producing the current quakes and I’m sick to the teeth of having the word “socialism” act as the propagandistic shield behind which all this extortion and greed is taking place.

    (*) Oh, didn’t you know that Paulson was Chief Executive of Goldman Sachs before he took the position of Treasury Secretary? And that Goldman’s biggest rival was Lehman which, unfortunately, the US Treasury refused to bail out? But that AIG was/is heavily invested by Goldman and — lookee here — it got rescued (saving Goldman Sachs US$20billion)? So, a third point is, when you start talking about “the government”, be very very sure you’re really talking about “the government” and not clearly transparent “personal agendas”, m’kay?

  • Remember when I said…

    0

    It seemed like only late last month when I mentioned, in passing, that capping banking executive pays would not achieve anything:

    I’m positive there’ll be loopholes which will enable those executives to take that money away in other instruments (shares, for example, or some other kind of options; deferred quasi-pension payments; post-employment “consultation” fees; etc.), so it’ll stop exactly diddley-squat.

    But sentiment in the blogosphere was still adamant that this was an Important Provision that Had To Pass. Well, in Bloomberg this morning, under a headline that read “Blankfein’s $70 Million Would Survive Paulson’s Rules”, I read that:

    Blankfein, 54, was Wall Street’s best-paid CEO in 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. He “could still make tens of millions of dollars if he continues to receive stock grants and Goldman’s stock rises,” said David Schmidt, a senior consultant for New York-based compensation firm James F. Reda & Associates.

    With the added detail that,

    While performance-related pay over $1 million has been tax-deductible, companies were able to write off only $1 million of salary since 1993 [my emphasis, which shows that some irritant has been in place since 1993 ... but it still didn't change anything].

    As a result, bankers’ salaries were often set beneath the $1 million cap. Blankfein’s was $600,000 last year, with the rest of his package coming in incentive compensation and services, including a car and driver, according to regulatory filings.

    Doesn’t sound like much until you realise that Blanfein’s “official” salary was $600,000 last year, BUT “the rest of the package” meant he managed to walk away with total compensation of $70,300,000 for 2007 alone. Man, that’s some “package”. Wonder where I can get me some?

    So I think that makes it Kaz’s Cynicism, 1; Laudable Naive Sentiment, 0.

    POSTSCRIPT: I know, why am I blogging every day this week? Especially when I specifically said I’d be cutting down? My own perversity, I suspect. It’s an enemy I’ve yet to defeat.

  • I just can’t win

    2

    As you know, given a choice, I tend to the science-fiction spectrum of creative writing. I like the way I can use it to explore ideas; I like the world-building; I like the research involved (even if I do subsequently bend it into shapes unrecognisable). However, I may just have to give it up.

    I’m referring, of course, to the Planetary Activation Organization [sic]. This is an organisation with a substantial website that hopes to empower all of us now because:

    We are now in the interim period before a first contact is attempted between us and the member star nations of the Galactic Federation. What it means to us is that we are now on the verge of a new global society that will allow us to finally see who we really are.

    They talk about quantum biology,

    Quantum biology states that the energy of thought can alter body cells, change metabolism, and most importantly, transform RNA/DNA

    temporal mechanics,

    time is beginning to be compressed. A by-product of this compression is that our karma cycles have been greatly accelerated

    and physics,

    Cosmology has been discovering that the physical universe does not always obey the presently-known laws of physics.

    They talk about the Galactic Federation of Light, that:

    was founded over 4.5 million years ago to prevent inter-dimensional dark forces from dominating and exploiting this galaxy. At present, there are just over 200,000 member star nations, confederations or unions. Approximately 40% are humanoids and the rest are varied forms of sentient beings. Most members of the Galactic Federation are fully conscious beings.

    To familiarize you with our space family, we will periodically present information about a Galactic Federation member species. We hope that this information will help you identify or validate any experiences you may have had with some of these beings. Our purpose is to foster goodwill and understanding of the star nations that are answering the call of Earth’s Spiritual Hierarchy to assist us in our ascension/transformation process.

    Species include Andromedans, Acturians, Bellatricians, Centaurians, etc. It’s all on the website, together with their physical characteristics, special abilities, the language/s they speak, and how much sleep(!) they need.

    That’s it, folks. Game over. I make up this kind of information for fiction, but these guys are for real. How can I possibly compete? I might as well just give it up. My only ray of sunshine is that the Galactic Federation was supposed to appear in Earth’s skies TODAY! As per Blossom Goodchild’s post:

    We wish it to be understood that on the 14th day of your month of October in the year 2008 a craft of great size shall be visible within your skies. It shall be in the south of your hemisphere and it shall scan over many of your states.
    We give to you the name of Alabama.
    It has been decided that we shall remain within your atmosphere for the minimum of three of your twenty four hour periods.

    Blossom, a channelling medium, although American (*), does have some rudimentary knowledge of world geography, because she queried the Federation about the fact that Alabama is not in the Southern Hemisphere. Kudos, Blossom.

    I queried this to the Federation and was told … ‘In days of old, it used to be’.

    Aw, that Galactic Federation! They’re such kidders!

    So, it boils down to this: if the Galactic Federation appears, I’m out of a job. But if they don’t, I may just continue on my merry way and pretend I never heard about the Galactic Federation of Light. I’m not too arrogant to say that I just can’t compete.

    (*) UPDATE: Aw damn, two good YouTube links down the gurgler! Just found out that Blossom is Australian, not American. Apologies to Blossom. And to Americans. Unfortunately, I think I’ll keep the YouTube links up because they’re funny.

  • Not a winner, but …

    1

    If you’ve been a reader of mine for any length of time, you would’ve noticed that I’m the author of Near Misses. That is, chances are if one of my stories are up for any kind of competition, I don’t win, but I get a nice pat on the head. That sounds a little … ungracious, but it’s really not meant to be. It’s awfully nice to get a pat on the head, especially when you’re a lone writer sitting in front of a keyboard, bathed by the light of a flatscreen monitor, in a house barely above the Equator.

    So, the tenth Gaylactic Spectrum Awards (that recognises the best works that science-fiction, fantasy and horror have to offer with significant positive GLBT content) were announced at the Awards Banquet in Washington, DC this past weekend. The winners were (thanks to Short Fiction judge andyhat for the info):

    2008 Best Novel – Wicked Gentlemen by Ginn Hale

    And the novel sounds way cool. From its Amazon page:

    Belimai Sykes is many things: a Prodigal, the descendant of ancient demons, a creature of dark temptations and rare powers. He is also a man with a brutal past and a dangerous addiction. And Belimai Sykes is the only man Captain William Harper can turn to when faced with a series of grisly murders. But Mr. Sykes does not work for free and the price of Belimai’s company will cost Captain Harper far more than his reputation. From the ornate mansions of noblemen, where vivisection and sorcery are hidden beneath a veneer of gold, to the steaming slums of Hells Below, Captain Harper must fight for justice and for his life. His enemies are many and his only ally is a devil he knows too well.

    2008 Best Short Fiction – Ever So Much More Than Twenty by Joshua Lewis

    From an out of print (I think) anthology, So Fey: Queer Fairy Fiction, that’s about to be republished by Prime Books, so look out for that one.

    2008 Best Other Work – hasn’t been posted yet, as of time of writing this blog

    I’m pleased to say that my novella Prime Suspect, while it didn’t win in the Short Fiction section, made the cut onto the Recommended Short List, which was more than I expected. I was up against really tough competition, and recognised some names of fellow members of the Broad Universe organisation. (A big holler and wave to other Short Listers, Catherine Lundoff (who I’ll be interviewing at Radio Free Bliss within a month) and JoSelle Vanderhooft (who I’ve already interviewed!)). I’m basking in the fine company I’m keeping.

    And, most importantly of all, thanks to whomever nominated me for the award in the first place. Thank you, thank you, thank you. You really made my year. Really.

    This also seems as good a time as any to announce a change in the blogging schedule. It’s time for me to do some hard thinking on where I’m going with This Writing Thing. Until it gets sorted, I’ll be dropping down to two regular blogs per week, on Tuesdays and Fridays, starting next week.

  • Join me in the GWoG

    0

    As the drama from the last blog unfolded, we saw that C—a’s contamination of animate objects’ food supplies began with the mel.a.mine contamination of wheat gluten that was used to boost protein levels in pet food. In the spirit of diversification, however, companies decided to add the powder to in.fant formula, as a way of boosting that food’s protein content as well. (Milk protein powder is much more expensive than plant protein (e.g. soya) powder mixed with industrial mel.a.mine scrap. Also, industrial grade mel.a.mine is different to industrial mel.a.mine scrap, with the former, purer, product costing more than ten times the more contaminated latter.) And of course, since then, we’ve discovered that dai.ry-based candies have also been affected.

    And let’s not forget the toothpaste-containing-antifreeze debacle, the leaded baby bib scandal, the industrial fluids in alcohol ploy, the counterfeit drugs trick. Seriously, I’m not about to touch C—ese “organic” produce in supermarkets with a three-metre pole. And, just spinning the globe for a moment, let’s not also forget the Wall Street Bailout Plan, now officially known as the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. There has already been much written about this, so I won’t belabour the point, but just assume that you already know far more about securities and leveraging than you wanted to, right?

    And so all this is why I’m announcing today, the start of the Global War on Greed(tm). This GWoG, as you’ll see, has admitted similarities, yet several significant advantages, over the GWoT (Global War on Terror), which I’ll outline below.

    Firstly, it’s more dispersed all over the globe. Forget being constrained to just Muslim countries. With the GWoG, you can go anywhere, from Arizona to Antarctica, and still be assured of that warm glow of righteousness.

    Secondly, it makes you feel good for longer. The GWoT has a problem in that only your sense of fear is lessened … unless you start thinking of other strategies those damned terries can use, in which case your anxiety rockets up again. With the GWoG, that buzz sticks around for longer, giving you many more moments of content smugness while you relate your footsoldier role to the young ‘uns.

    Thirdly, it’s neverending. Like the GWoT, the GWoG is a constant battle of the forces of righteousness against the forces of Satanic evil. But it’s everywhere! Which means more money for anti-greed surveillance drones, ground-to-hoarder missile systems, and price-fixing defence shields. Think of the additional research money that can be poured into experiments to find out which part of the brain lights up more in greedy people, whether bumps on the head can be used as a harbinger of excessive avarice, and if stress variations in the voice indicate impending episodes of avarice?

    Fourthly, it has a slippery slope. When is a person a terrorist? When they actually bomb a building? When they talk about bombing a building? When they think about bombing a building? We can use the same kind of sliding scale of intent-in-the-absence-of-hard-evidence to also put away all those greedy people. Wait, what do you mean doesn’t everyone have thoughts about throttling an opponent, blowing an offending car off the road, or grabbing two freebie bags off the table instead of just one? Ah, let’s talk about that one later. I mean, obviously, even though you’ve had that thought about freebie bags, you’re okay, right? Like me. And the next point.

    Fifthly (and the GWoG really trounces the GWoT on this one), you have shifting sands galore. It’s not easy to switch from, say, Roman Catholic to Muslim, at the drop of a hat, but you can be reclassified from “saint” to “selfish twit” in a heartbeat. And back again. No supporting documentation required. Combine this with point four, and we’re smokin’ people!

    So, what do you say? Will you join me in this latest crusade? I guarantee it’ll be more entertaining than the other GWo. And just as successful. Guaranteed.

    POSTSCRIPT: I’ve just been informed that, as the potential prime suspects in the GWoG are more likely to be multi-billionaires and the ruling governments of the day, rather than ordinary people, the chances of the GWoG getting off the ground are — where’s that sticky note again? — ah yes, here it is … absolutely NIL. However, using the method of turning a frown upside down, it means that the GWoG is as successful as the GWoT! Mission accomplished people. Thank you for your support.

    POSTSCRIPT^2: Oh, lookee here. C—a has problems with mel.a.mine in vegetables. What a goddamn surprise, wouldn’t you say?

  • Mel. a. mine as a saga

    0

    It was The Reg that got me thinking about this by pointing out that the greed that started the mel.a.mine scare has managed to hurt more people, pets and industries than any one single terrorist act.

    And it’s true. While it may all have started with C—ese company Xu.zhou An.ying advertising a miracle “protein powder” booster, North American pet makers bought into it in a big way by lapping up their claims and using the magical E.S.B. “protein powder” as, firstly, a pet food extender. Consequence: remember that massive pet food recall, was it last year?

    But it was still a good product for boosting protein levels even though: (a) it had absolutely no nutritional value despite its masking effect as a protein and, (b) ahem, led to kidney problems that could kill the user. And, besides, C—a had a growing surplus of mel.a.mine and, like all good budding capitalists, was probably wondering what to do about it in order to turn a profit. Enter Xu.zhou An.ying. (For more details on casual mel.a.mine substitution in feed, see these articles from the New York Times.)

    (So one tip, right off the bat, is to watch out for any meat products originating from C—a too, even though the FDA says:

    “Based on information currently available, FDA and USDA believe the likelihood of illness after eating pork from swine fed the contaminated product would be very low.”

    But, then again, you already know how cynical I am.)

    Back to the story. Really, this mel.a.mine saga began as an intro to the blog, but is getting so interesting in its own right, that it might just take over completely.

    So, rightly suspicious, the FSIS and USDA (Food Safety and Inspection Service & U.S. Department of Agriculture, respectively), after a couple of events, like a bag of mel.a.mine being repackaged as a bag of food-grade wheat gluten, decided — way back in 2007 — to begin testing a variety of imported wheat-related food products coming into the US from C—a. And good on them, I say. If we depended solely on “self-regulation” and the “free market” and “enlightened self-interest”, then we’d all be dead, to be blunt.

    While this was a laudable move, the ingenuity of the C—ese once more sidestepped a potential containment of the problem by moving to … in.fant formula! Well, I mean, it’s a win-win people. You get rid of your “mel.a.mine scrap” surplus AND boost a food’s protein level at the same time. I mean, where’s the downside? Oh yeah, people can die. But profits can soar. What are you, some kind of damned socialist?

    Continued next blog…

    * Oh yeah, you’re wondering about the dots, dashes, spaces and strange formatting, aren’t you? I know that certain terms together can’t get past C—ese internet filters, but am not sure which ones they are. I’m making a guess that it could be C—ese and mel.a.mine together. And I know I have at least one reader in C—a, so I’m hoping this will get through. For some strategies in circumvention, go here.

  • Trip to Desaru Beach

    4

    It was the Muslim New Year last week, so we piled the kids into the car and took a trip to Desaru Beach, about one and a half hours’ drive away. The Visit Malaysia – Johor brochure (hardcopy, so you’ll just have to trust me on this) says:

    Desaru boasts 25km of inviting beaches fringed by palms and casuarinas … The waters here are perfect for a relaxing swim, water-skiing and catamaran sailing.

    THE GOOD: Oh man, they weren’t kidding when they said 25km of beach. It curves gracefully away in each direction, stretches of gold, with only one section directly in front of the public car park (entry fee RM3 per car) full of people. The rest of the 24.5km remains relatively clear, just begging for you to explore. The other thing I liked about Desaru (which I detest Australian beaches for) is that you can find actual shade under actual trees while still on the actual beach. In Australia, walking a beach is like being targeted by a cheerful laser in a desert, hellbent on giving you skin cancer. That’s why, despite the beautiful, blazing white and pristine sand, visiting Australian beaches holds no attraction for me any more.

    The water at Desaru is a lovely temperature and, once you get past the line of “dumpies” (waves that dump rather than roll), the water is still shallow and — at least where we were swimming — free of rips. Just along the most frequently-parked portion of beach, is a hut plastered with Carlsberg signs that sells much-appreciated drinks. It’s open every day till 5:30pm and there are tables, chairs and umbrellas, so you can sit and enjoy your drink while watching the goings on.

    Later in the afternoon, we tramped down the length of the beach and picked up a fantastic collection of sea shells and corals.

    On our trip to Desaru, we offshot our original turn-off and ended up driving through the town of Saleng to get to the major junction at Kulai. Can I say, Saleng is a charming town? We liked driving through it so much that we deliberately “lost” ourselves on the way back, just so we could drive though Saleng again.

    The other humorous bit was passing a town called “Tawar Air 1″, which had me reaching for the kamus (dictionary) that we always keep in the glove box.

    Tawar means tasteless,” I told J. “Tasteless Water One. Unfortunate name for a nice-looking town.”
    “Maybe they meant neutral. Or good. As in ‘it doesn’t poison us’.”
    “If they meant good, then it would be something like boleh. Boleh Air 1. But it isn’t. It’s Tawar Air 1. No, someone at this place must’ve thought the water sucked.”

    Minutes later, we passed Tawar Air 2. Then directions to Tawar Air 3.

    “Wow,” I said, “whomever explored this area really didn’t like the water very much.”

    But I thought that explorer was perhaps going beyond descriptive — into catty — when we passed Tawar Air’s 4, 5 and 6. I’m sorry, Tasteless Waters. You all looked like cosy little towns to me. I’m sorry you had to get stuck with those names.

    THE BAD: There are occasional signs along the road to Desaru highlighting “Caution! Accident Area”. Pity they didn’t put it along the entire damn road. In fact, every single road throughout Malaysia should be designated as an Accident Area. A lot of drivers are people who (seriously) should’ve failed their driving tests — driving at inappropriate speeds along bumpy roads, veering across double lines in the face of oncoming traffic, and overtaking across said lines, around corners and over hills. I wouldn’t mind so much, except what’s going to happen when they met a vehicle approaching in the opposite direction? For this reason, my tip, as the mother of two small children, is to try and stay in the middle of a traffic pack whenever possible. That way, if someone tries something stupid, it’s the car at the front that’s more likely to cop it.

    The road itself, considering that Desaru is a major destination for locals and the occasional brave Singaporean, is also in pretty bad repair and could do with major rework. That explains one reason why people drive in the middle of the road — to avoid the patches-on-patches that turn mere driving into an exciting roller-coaster ride of adventure. And only one lane each way for much of the journey? C’mon, Department of Transport, what are you doing with your funds? Spending them all in the Klang Valley, I bet.

    When we got to Desaru Beach, we found only one restaurant. In Malaysia, the land of a million food places???? Were they nuts????? And the restaurant didn’t even have everything on their menu. “No, sorry, no ikan (fish).” Which nuked half the menu there and then. “No, nasi lemak is finished already.” Which, at 11am, disappointed The Wast, who has grown to like the national dish. J ordered the beef burger. For some reason, the beef patties you buy here are a bright pink, even after being cooked. This is rather disconcerting, especially when the colour looks unnatural to begin with. And the reason why you can find 5kg bags (or 25kg buckets) of mayonnaise in the local supermarkets is that they use a fifth of it on every burger they make. I had the nasi goreng kampung, which is fried rice, village-style, with an egg on top. That means lots of itsy bitty chopped up chilli and anchovies (ikan bilis) mixed into the rice. What can I say? I’m a sucker for fried ikan bilis.

    THE UGLY: Tourism Malaysia says:

    Desaru is located 100 kilometres from Johor Bahru, and is a very popular destination for its clean beaches, excellent golf courses and unique attractions.

    Hold on. Back up. Did Tourism Malaysia say “clean beaches“???? ‘Cos it ain’t. Oh, it’s long and it’s 100km from JB, and it’s fringed by trees. But, people, clean it most definitely isn’t. I saw plastic bread wrappers in the water, and bottles, plastic bags, and broken glass littering every metre of the beach. It got to the point where we were looking out for shards of glass more than sea shells.

    I can say that some Malaysians have absolutely no sense of pride in their country if they so carelessly litter their own environment (and I believe that’s true) but, the problem is, it’s also a bigger Asian issue. My mother used to throw sweet wrappers out the car window until, one day, I stopped the car, reversed to the approximate position where she so thoughtlessly flung out the wrapper, got out and searched through the grass until I found similar litter. She was so embarrassed by my behaviour that she never again littered while I was driving her anywhere.

    Oh, and before any Singaporeans start up about how their country is so clean, I’ve lived there. It isn’t. I got sick of having to dodge plastic bags of food being flung from apartment windows on my way to the swimming pool — used sanitary napkins, uneaten rice, cigarette butts, chewed chicken bones — when the rubbish chute was situated inside every apartment, next to the kitchen itself for Chrissakes! You actually have to walk further to get to the window! I tried growing herbs on the balcony until I started finding used tissues amongst the seedlings. And I know enough Malaysians who complain about how Singaporeans will use rubbish bins in their own country then, driving up through Malaysia, throw drink cans and the kitchen sink out their car windows. (Thus illustrating that punitive, financial penalties will only work so far. The only real way to permanently stop people from such behaviour may be to shame them into something better … not sure; still thinking this one through.) So, no, Singapore can’t claim any high ground whatsoever. Brunei, the richest little country in the region, is also a disgrace, with the amount of litter that’s thrown into the river around Bandar Seri Begawan. (I’ve seen it for myself.) And I don’t believe Indonesia or Thailand are much better.

    And it’s a crying shame. Coming back to our day trip, Desaru is a great beach, looking out over the incredibly historic and romantic South China Sea. It’s gentle, picturesque, shady, with lots of room for everybody. And it’s also absolutely filthy. I dropped an email to the Johor branch of Tourism Malaysia, describing our experience and asking them to PLEASE clean up the place, including a few suggestions on how they may do this and leverage the local and business communities at the same time. Let’s see if anything happens.

    DESARU BEACH RATING: I’m sorry to say, as it stands now, 4 out of 10.

  • Word, Richard Stallman

    0

    Who’s Richard Stallman? He’s founder of the Free Software Foundation, and creator of GNU way back in the computing prehistory of 1983. (Wikipedia biography here.) And he has come out strongly against cloud computing.

    What is cloud computing? Cloud computing describes a group of applications that run on the Internet, like Gmail or Google Docs. You don’t keep the data on your hard disk but, instead, log onto a service via your browser to access your email, documents, spreadsheets, virtual scrapbooks (i.e. photos) etc. . In the Guardian article where I’m getting all this from (via Good Morning Silicon Valley), Mr Stallman first comes out with a pearl of generic wisdom:

    Somebody is saying this is inevitable – and whenever you hear somebody saying that, it’s very likely to be a set of businesses campaigning to make it true.

    And follows this up by a small fact that’s basically irrefutable:

    “One reason you should not use web applications to do your computing is that you lose control,” he said. “It’s just as bad as using a proprietary program. Do your own computing on your own computer with your copy of a freedom-respecting program. If you use a proprietary program or somebody else’s web server, you’re defenceless. You’re putty in the hands of whoever developed that software.”

    If you think I’m exaggerating, have a look at this related article from the Guardian, where Nick Saber got locked out of Google:

    Suddenly, Nick can’t access his Gmail account, can’t open Google Talk (our office IM app), can’t open Picasa where his family pictures are, can’t use his Google Docs, and oh by the way, he paid for additional storage. So, this is a paying customer with no access to the Google empire.

    and only found out when he got the “Your account has been disabled” message flash up on the screen. The other reason the overarching use of cloud computing is a stupid idea, and not just because you can get locked out of your own private and/or work data at the whim of a complete stranger, is the EULA (End User License Agreement). For those of you who have mail, documents, photos on various sites, did you read the EULA when you signed up — well aware of what rights you were clicking away — or did you just jab ‘Accept’ and move on? Thought so. Did you know about the part in Google’s Chrome browser EULA that initially said that, in using Chrome, you were giving Google:

    a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.

    Now, Google has gone ahead and modified its EULA to flense all that badness completely, but if it wasn’t for some eagle-eyed geeks who actually read the damn thing, who knows what the Big G would have done with that paragraph and your data sometime down the track? But Google just says, it’s a mistake, dudes. Hey, it’s us. Google. We’re the coool company. We wouldn’t screw you over. Yeah, sure, it’s a legally binding paragraph in a legal contract between two parties, no matter that it happens via electrons on the Net, but we didn’t meeeeeaaaaaannnn it.

    The question is, do you believe them? Was this an underhanded tactic on Google’s part? Or is Google Legal completely and utterly incompetent? I’m sure you’ll agree, both options are unpalatable.

    Yes yes, I’ll admit I’m a grumpy, cynical woman. And perhaps Google is all ponies and unicorns. And maybe electronic voting machines with no verifiable paper trail backups are the best things to use in an election. But, (a) I ain’t betting on it, and (b) I *always* read the EULAs. And so should you.

    EDIT: The revised bailout plan passed the House, of course. Barack Obama voted Yes, Joe Biden voted Yes, John McCain voted Yes.

Page 1 of 212»