Archive for April, 2009

  • The apocalypse is closer than you think!

    1

    No, I haven’t gone bonkers! Well, not more than I am already. It’s just that my good friend and extraordinarily talented writer, Maria Zannini, has just had her debut novel, Touch of Fire, released in print and I’m sharing the lurve!

    Here’s the cover:

    Cover for Touch of Fire

    Delish, isn’t it? And here’s the blurb:

    Earth is a fusion of culture, language and religion, and the world is divided between plainfolk and the fae, Elemental mages who are born with the ability to manipulate one of the four great elements, earth, air, fire and water. The technology of the old world has been extinct for centuries. One man dares to resurrect it. And only one woman can stop him.

    A great cover and a great plot. What more do you need? I’m scheduling Maria on my Bliss podcast for this month but, for now, the best thing you can do is go here to read an excerpt at Maria’s site and here for the next obvious step of buying it! And if you’re not reading Maria’s blog … well, you should. For a start, it’s less ranty and more informative than mine! :: grin ::

    Congratulations on the release, M! And the very best wishes for Touch of Fire‘s success.

  • Society and community

    3

    I awoke this morning to the horrifying news of the Abruzzo earthquake. With a confirmed 150 people dead and 50,000+ homeless, it’s nothing less than a tragic situation. And the timing, in the early morning, was also a devastating compounding factor. I read that there had been warnings of the coming earthquake but that a scientist who voiced the warning was silenced by threats of being charged with “public mischief”. If this is true, then it’s a sad indictment of the state of Italian society … however, I can only find such a revelation in Australian papers (The Age, Sydney Morning Herald, Canberra Times, AOL Australia … all Fairfax papers) and nothing of it outside. I wonder why that is?

    In any case, that’s an appropriate segue into something else. So here goes.

    It took me the experience of living in the United States for several years to work out the difference between society and community. Up till that time, I thought they were the same thing.

    The lesson was brought home to me recently when I read this article in the UK paper, The Daily Mail. It’s about  Sacramento’s “Tent City”, recently publicised by Oprah Winfrey apparently. From other reports, it appears that the Mail’s estimate of 1,200 people living in Tent City may be an exaggeration; figures more around 400-500 are mentioned from other sources. But that’s not what I wanted to talk about. I was, instead, struck by a vignette in the article:

    Former car salesman Corvin and his wife Tena are among the newest residents of the tent city. The couple, who are in their fifties, lost their home and jobs around the same time. With homeless shelters full in Sacramento, they had little choice but to use what savings they had left to buy a tent.
    The couple admit they have yet to tell their grown-up children about their hand-to-mouth existence. Tena said: ‘I have a 35-year-old son, and he doesn’t know. I call him, about once a month and on holidays, to let him know that I’m well and healthy.
    ‘He would love me anyway, but I don’t want to worry him.’

    Their story made me wonder about the functioning of a society where parents refuse to ask their children for help (or the converse) in tough times. There is no “community” here. There’s barely a “family”. And it’s going to make surviving the current economic crisis in the USA that much more difficult. Please don’t think this is an original idea on my part. Dmitry Orlov has been talking about the differences in survival attitude between the Soviet Union collapse and now the American collapse for quite some time now. He even has a book out on it, called “Reinventing Collapse“.  I like Orlov’s sense of humour, even if I think he’s taking the easy way out by concentrating on only the most visible consequences of economic collapse, but then, I’m not in America getting laid off at the rate of hundreds of thousands of jobs a month, so who am I to talk?

    One thing Orlov touches on is how a community helps the individual during times of personal hardship, and it appears to be a lesson that’s difficult to learn in a society where — as I’ve always thought of America — if you’re poor, it’s your fault, and if you’re rich, it’s your fault. The old military slogan of “An Army of One” also tried to tap into an attitude of rampant individualism that seems to run, like a thick core, through the American psyche. It may have been okay when times were good (not really, for a socialist like me, although a capitalist may have thought so), but it’s really bad now for all such individualists when things have taken a downturn. The contrast is none so blinding as when I look out my own front door.

    We’ve been dragged kicking and screaming into Malaysian “community” life. Only last week, a friend came by with an assortment of fruit trees that she had carried herself, by bus, from Perak state down to Johor. You see, we are on a third of an acre of land here and, looking out over the waving grass, our friend decided that what we needed were fruit trees. So, after a casual jokey comment about using the land productively (that I equally casually agreed to), she turned up on our doorstep with several young trees, handed them over — after telling us how she had come by (and buy) them — and commented that she’d be happy to drive over and pick the fruit once the trees are established and producing.

    Meanwhile, J and I had plans for a significant percentage of that spare land, but knew nothing was going to happen for at least a year, while we built up our home budget. So now, I have to think about where we’re going to plant the fruit trees while still keeping space for our own plans.

    Does this put a crimp in our designs? Certainly. Is it inconvenient? Yes. Should I have thanked my friend profusely but refused her gift? Absolutely not. And I’ll tell you why.

    It’s all part of “community”. And that means sacrificing some of our own convenience in order to belong to a bigger support network. I mean, that’s what a community is, right? A support network of people you can draw on when things are bad, and who help celebrate with you when things are good.

    So, in the spirit of community, I’ll do adequate research to ensure our newest arrivals get the best amateur horticultural care they can. We’ll modify our plans and scale back on what we wanted to do to give the young mango, mangosteen and rambutan trees a chance to establish. (I hear there are durian trees arriving as well. Yikes!) We’ll nurture the trees and invite our friends over for fruit-picking parties. We’ll give them permission to drop by and roam the garden when we’re not at home, if that’s at a time that’s more convenient for them. And, all this, because we’re not just members of a society, but are swiftly — whether we like it or not — becoming part of a community.

    Now, the important thing to remember is that this is not all one-way. If an emergency comes up and we need to have the kids looked after, even overnight or for a couple of days, I have somewhere to go. I’ve got the number of another friend who assures me his mobile is on  24×7 and who would be more than happy to handle any Malay-language issues we may have in case of a sudden calamity. If we’re hungry and penniless, there are people who will feed us, and who will help us find jobs or take up a collection to help, or give us clothes, or help find buyers for any assets we may want to get rid of.

    There’s an old lady with bad arthritis and breathing difficulties who wants to show me the best place to buy fresh spices. “Just drop by any time, and I’ll go with you.” There’s someone else who’s introduced us to possible employment leads. There’s another who vets all tradesmen who come and do work at our house because he considers that to be part of his job as our friend.

    And all because I planted a few fruit trees and we make a kettle of green tea every now and then. A worthy sacrifice, I think.

    I’ve always heard that Italian society is close-knit — although I am more than dismayed by their attitude to the recent influx of immigrants — and hope this community spirit helps everyone affected by the earthquake, migrant or not. After all, are we not all human?

  • Thoughts on #agentfail

    2

    Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ll know that Jessica Faust of BookEnds Literary Agency has been holding an #agentfail at her blog, after the recent #queryfail held by sundry agents. My comments:

    1) Several agents have commented on how much hostility there is in the 240+ plus comments. I’m wondering why they’re so surprised. Surely anybody would be upset if, say, they’d been kept waiting months overtime for a service they were told would be much shorter. It’s like handing your car to a garage. They say they’ll take 2 weeks and yet, after 3 months, they still haven’t let you know whether the vehicle is ready or not. If you call them, there’s a chance they’ll just tow your vehicle onto the street and leave it there. I think anybody would get upset at that. And, let’s face it, it’s not 240 acidic comments from one person, which would really be manic. It’s 240 comments from 239 people so, again, what did you expect?

    [ASIDE: And, of course, if you discount everything as a blood hazed tirade, then you can ignore all the polite and cogent postings as well, can't you? Personally, I was wondering about the utility of #agentfail in the first place because of this.]

    I’m wondering whether the emo response from some agents is because they’d rather get angry with the vitriol and bitterness of the posters than actually change their own behaviour to something more approaching reality. I’m sometimes guilty of that myself, so can understand the rationalisation, even if I don’t like it.

    2) I used to not worry when I saw “no response means not interested”. Like another poster, I always assumed that meant a default “no”. However, a sizeable number of posters commented that, since it takes x months to write a manuscript, the least an agent can do is spend 10 seconds rejecting something they don’t like. I hadn’t thought of it like that before and am fast coming around to their way of thinking. If agents talk about a two-way relationship, and they want to be treated with respect and courtesy, then I think they should be expected to treat prospective clients in the same way.

    (Nathan Bransford had an interesting insight, in that he thinks such statements are made by agents whose lists are almost full. This might well be the most reasonable explanation although it still smacks of arrogance. That’s what naturally happens where you have a situation of supply completely overwhelming demand.)

    On the other hand …. As you well know, I work in IT Support. When customers contact me, they’re usually pissed. They’re not 100% hopeful or bright or cocky. They’re not trying to win me over with how scintillating they are, or impress me by telling me how wonderful I am. They. Are. PISSED. They yell, they rant, some have even physically threatened me. And, unlike quite a few agents, these people know exactly where I work (often in the neighbouring suburb to them). Yet, I know that the onus is on ME to behave in a professional manner. Quite simply, if I don’t, there’s the awful chance I’ll lose control of the situation and may even get fired. Now, there are three ways I can handle this situation:

    One: I can tell them that I’m a human being, not a punching bag, and they can go to hell if they take that tone of voice with me.

    Two: I can accept it as part of my job and cultivate strategies to deal with it while behaving in as professional a manner as possible.

    Three: I can stop working in Support and try to find another Line of Business to move to.

    What I find interesting is using this same lens on agents. Unlike me, 99% of their callers ARE hopeful, bright and cocky. They ARE trying to win them over with how scintillating they are. They ARE trying to impress them by telling them how wonderful they are. And yet the consensus seems to be that they are treated in a less than forthright manner. Not by all agents, but there’s certainly a trend in the 240+ comments and, without having enough information to break it down by specific agent, the trend is all I can go on. As a result, I find the outright rudeness suffered by the blog posters to be sad and unjustifiable.

    3) I also look askance at those agents who complain about the amount of work they have to do. (*) They’re still working deep into the night. Well, okay, so do I on occasion (like last night) and, unlike them, I’m a wage-slave, so there’s no real pay-off for me except a (hopefully) decent annual performance review (not guaranteed) and a sense of personal satisfaction weeks down the line when a problem is resolved (again, not guaranteed).

    4) And, lastly, I don’t blame anyone for posting anonymously. If some agent comments are anything to go on, they were right to do so. And, again, that’s a shame. Unlike me in my hapless Support position, where a disgruntled customer can get me fired if they have enough justification, hopeful writers can’t fire an agent based on their lack of courtesy or professionalism.

    All this makes me wonder if agents truly realise what a privileged position they hold in so many ways.

    And, a last point to re-emphasise something I said earlier. A number of people have said that the level of anger in the comments interferes with the utility of the message …. Know something? If I really could ignore anything that was said in anger just because it was said in anger …? Wow, then I wouldn’t need to do any work AT ALL. Just because there’s strong emotion involved, doesn’t mean there isn’t a pearl mixed in with the crap. To discount one because of the other is a cop-out.

    (*) Note that I’m not talking about those agents who relay stats on how many queries are in their Inbox, and how caught up they are. Or aren’t. I find that kind of stuff fascinating. I’m talking about those agents who then go on and complain about their terrible working hours. Boo hoo, sweetheart.

  • From Venezuela to Malaysia (via the UK and USA)

    2

    A number of months ago, I had the pleasure of interviewing Charles Tan, tireless crusader for all things fiction, RPG and speculative in the Philippines. (And, by tireless, I mean it. With the number of blogs he posts every day — and the amount of information in each — I’m surprised he has time to do anything else.) I was interviewing Charles for an article Sue Burke and I were pitching to Broad Universe, and I’m pleased to say that the article — published in Broad Universe’s online magazine, the Broadsheet — is up! It’s entitled “Women and Genre Writing in Spain and South-east Asia“. Go have a read.

    And, btw, if you’re a female writer (or support women writers) in the fields of science fiction, fantasy and horror, do consider joining the Broads. They are a professional and supportive bunch and I’m very proud to be associated with them.

    From one extreme (capable, thoughtful, intelligent women), we move to the other. Specifically, Dayana Mendoza. If you don’t recognise the name, think of her under her more popular moniker of Miss Universe. Recently, she and Miss USA (Crystle Stewart aka Miss Texas) had the opportunity of visiting Guantánomo Bay. According to the USO (United Service Organizations), they organised it as part of a March tour to “boost [troop] morale”. In Mendoza’s original post (which has now been sanitised by Donny Trump’s pageant company), she said she and Crystle:

    had a wonderful time, this truly was a memorable trip! We hung out with the guys from the East Coast and they showed us the boat inside and out, how they work and what they do, we took a ride around the land and it was a loooot of fun!

    So there you go, people. The woman of women who all want “world peace” while posing in swimsuits think Guantánomo was a “loooot of fun”. I think that should go on a t-shirt. But wait, there’s more:

    We also met the Military dogs, and they did a very nice demonstration of their skills.

    With naked, blindfolded prisoners who have been in incarceration for more than half a decade and yet STILL not charged with anything yet, perhaps? But don’t worry. As dim as you think Mendoza may be, she won’t have to rely on her questionable mental faculties for memories of the “calm and beautiful” place. You see:

    … the name of [Guantánomo] comes from the little pieces of broken glass from hundred of years ago …. [W]e met a beautiful lady named Rebeca who does wonders with the glasses from the beach. She creates jewelry with it and of course I bought a necklace from her that will remind me of Guantánamo Bay :)

    Ah, my heart flutters just thinking about it. She ends her blog with a heartfelt:

    I didn’t want to leave

    Maybe that can be arranged.

    (Articles on this tasteful episode of Miss Universe intellectual prowess can be found here, here and a brief mention here (number eight). Mendoza’s newly-bleached blog can be found here. Really, you’d think NBC and Donald Trump would have told all their “ambassadors” by now to just smile and keep their mouths shut. Multitasking just doesn’t seem to be part of these women’s capabilities.)

Page 2 of 2«12