Archive for December, 2011

  • I am 500 years old, colonialism and Caucasianism

    0

    There are not too many ethnic groups around the world who can point to one specific event in history and say, “There, that’s where my race was born.” Usually, your ethnicity is something you’re aware of but is fuzzy and recedes into history. Not so for the Portuguese Eurasians of Malaysia (later, Singapore).

    This year is a Big Deal for us. It was in 1511 that Alfonso de Albuquerque invaded Melaka/Malacca and took the port by force. This was not the first time that the Portuguese tried to take Malacca, but they got thrown out in 1509 when the resident Sultan got wind of their plans. In 1511, a more prepared de Albuquerque and his armada returned to complete the conquest.

    Up to the point of Portuguese conquest, Malacca was an important trading port already centuries old. Over one hundred languages were spoken there and goods from as far away as Arabia and China were bought, sold and bartered. The avaricious Portuguese, stumbling across this financial jewel, of course had to have it and, in the process, destroyed it through a time of constant war, atrocities and strife.

    So the Portuguese were the first Western colonial power in the region. That lasted for less than 150 years until the Dutch invaded. Whatever else you say about the Portuguese, at least they believed in trying to assimilate with the native populations. (Hence, moi.) Not so the Dutch and, if you’re in any doubt about it, I suggest you talk to a knowledgeable Indonesian about their history under Dutch colonisation. (So much so that Indonesian patriots initially saw the Japanese invaders of WWII as liberators, until reality sadly showed them otherwise.)

    Then, after the Dutch, came the British and they managed to screw things up royally, as any impartial political observer of a young Malaysia’s founding precepts will tell you, before retreating almost sixty years ago.

    But the Portuguese Eurasians were there, through four colonial conquests (three Western and one Eastern), fleeing north, then south, as oncoming waves of invaders attempted to eradicate “half-breeds” from their patch of taken territory.

    While not wanting to actually (yuk!) marry us, it was the British who gave the Eurasians a start on the ladder of middle-class prosperity. Our European blood made us more palatable choices for posts as administrators, lawyers and public servants, a positive discrimination policy that the other races (rightly) resented. By the end of the nineteenth century, we were still Catholic (the Portuguese influence), but now owned our own landed properties and could afford servants of our own.

    So where are we now? From my estimates, the Portuguese Eurasian population numbers no more than twenty thousand throughout Malaysia and Singapore. Early this month, there was a giant parade and celebration in Malacca “celebrating” the 500th anniversary of the entry of de Albuquerque and his army of 1,200 men into the port. To my mind, that’s like the offspring of a rape celebrating the day her mother got violated.

    But we do that, don’t we? If the natives of Burkina Faso (and I’m using an hypothetical example here) had invaded and committed atrocities on the population of San Francisco back in the 1800s, I doubt that sequence of events would be celebrated with bands and fireworks a few centuries on. All I can do is look on, completely bemused, as it appears that we are prepared to excuse massacre after massacre because a Westerner did it.

    It goes further. Everybody tries to claim the “Eurasian” tag now. From the time when, as a teenager, I was described as a “slut” due to my race (all these half-breeds must fornicate at the drop of a hat, doncha know?), now it appears that every would-be model claims to be Eurasian and are lauded over in the press for their “Western features”, “blue eyes”, or whatever. All this, for a race that used to make other parents (Malay, Chinese, Indian) threaten to disown their children if even the whiff of a liaison with an Eurasian came up. Which is why, until very very recently, you get Eurasians only marrying Eurasians or Westerners. To be honest, nobody else wanted us.

    So believe me when I say, as a Portuguese Eurasian, looking back on half a millennia of personal history, that I don’t think it’s such a bad thing if we get diluted, genration by generation, and completely die out. The Portuguese themselves have never cared to establish any strong links with their communities scattered around the globe and the only value we seem to have in Asia is our connexion to some Western superiority trope that the continent still hasn’t managed to overthrow.

    In a so-called postcolonial world, we are still in thrall to Western fashion and while there are some Western concepts that should be taken up locally (fostering of innovation and creativity, participatory democracy, basic human rights, environmental awareness), that’s not what’s grabbing people by the long and straights. (Fyi, Asians don’t have short and curlies.) The people here seem to be more interested in the skin than the substance, the features rather than the ideas, Caucasianism rather than the categorical imperative.

    I call it Caucasianism but there should be a better term for this, the Asian equivalent of Orientalism, where the shallow features of a prevailing culture are used to infer deep (and, therefore, false) truth about that particular culture. In Caucasianism, we somehow conflate such trivia as the lack of epicanthic folds, the unhealthy pale skin, the height, the blue eyes, with sophistication and greater intelligence. This is a colonialist mentality far more pernicious and insidious than any Asia has suffered and we seem to have taken on its mantle eagerly. Asia really needs to grow up.

    * I’ll be out of action for the next two weeks. By the time I’m back, QUINTEN’S STORY should be out. Here’s hoping. Have a happy and safe holiday, if you are, and I’ll catch you mid-January.

  • Do the British even LIKE their children?

    7

    Last year, as we were driving around the neighbourhood, we noticed a banner up at the side of the road advertising Christmas Dinner at a nearby restaurant. With nothing planned for Christmas Eve, we decided to go there. And we did. It was stupendous. There was roast turkey and lamb, smoked salmon and mackerel, pasta, vegetables (including my fav, Brussel Sprouts) and a full range of desserts. Wine was offered at a special two-bottles-for-the-price-of-one, the tables were decorated and the staff were courteous, smiling and helpful. The best thing was, it was a buffet. We didn’t so much waddle, as roll, out the door at night’s end.

    I know this might be construed as racist but, just as the Chinese are generally seen as being industrious, Malays can throw extremely good parties. And even though all the staff were Malay (and thus Muslim), and there were unfortunately no pork products available (ham…sigh), the entire family was made to feel extremely welcome. There was even a Santa Claus (one of the staff) handing out little presents to all the kids who attended. I doubt anyone could have done it better.

    As you can imagine, after that wonderful night, we were waiting with bated breath for this year, hoping that the neighbourhood restaurant would do the same thing. What we forgot was this.

    Since last year, there has been a significant influx of expats into the area. British expats, mostly. And a group of them must have approached the management of the neighbourhood restaurant because, this year, we don’t have the dinner like we had last year. Oh no, this year, we have two parties. A kids’ party and, one and a half hours later, an adults’ party.

    This seems to be a peculiarly British and Australian thing, this division of…well, everything at a social event. (The Americans, from the Californian parties we attended, seem generally, thankfully, free of this kind of WTFery.) If there are Australians at a barbie, they’ll automatically divide into the men’s group and the women’s group, with a no-go area in between. (And, if you’re male and more interested in women, and thus cross the invisible line to go talk to said women, you’ll be regarded as a “poofter”, which is incredibly ironic as “poofter” is a derogatory term for a gay. If you’re a woman and more interested in talking to the men, well of course you’re a “slut”.)

    If you socialise with a bunch of Poms, they’ll inevitably throw an event where the kids have to disappear for hours on end while the adults have some fun. What’s interesting about this is that the Poms won’t organise an alternative to occupy the kids that aren’t supposed to be there, they’re just not supposed to be there, and it appears to be perfectly okay if their (and your) children are walking the streets or panhandling or something, as long as no carousing adult catches sight of one.

    Why I’m particularly bemused this year is that, of all the holidays of all the seasons of all of the year, you’d really expect CHRISTMAS to be a family event, wouldn’t you? I can understand a no-children rule at, say, a Valentine’s Day dinner or New Year’s Eve bash (and we’ve not attended more than a decades’ worth of said parties due to our little petals) but CHRISTMAS???? Good freakin’ grief!

    So there you go, another promising event shot to hell, and it’s all thanks to the British. Even when their colonising armies went home, their mentality obviously didn’t.

  • KDP Select appeals to my greed. Fails.

    7

    When I checked my email this morning, I noticed an interesting little note from KDP (Kindle Direct Publishing) in my Inbox. It said:

    We’re excited to introduce KDP Select…KDP Select gives you a new way to earn royalties, reach a broader audience, and use a new set of promotional tools.

    Right up front, Amazon hits you with the money:

    …KDP Select – a new option dedicated to KDP authors and publishers worldwide, featuring a fund of $500,000 in December 2011 and at least $6 million in total for 2012!

    Wow, you say, where do I sign up? Here’s the potatoes, disguised as meat:

    When you make any of your titles exclusive to the Kindle Store for at least 90 days, those with US rights will automatically be included in the Kindle Owners’ Lending Library and can earn a share of a monthly fund.  The monthly fund for December 2011 is $500,000 and will total at least $6 million in 2012.

    And, just to give you an example:

    For example, if total borrows of all participating KDP titles are 100,000 in December and your book was borrowed 1,500 times, you will earn $7,500 in additional royalties from KDP Select in December.

    Is that the sound of dribble hitting your keyboard that I hear?

    Okay, I’ll admit it. I thought about it. As Oscar Wilde said, “the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about”, and Sandal Press needs all the promotional help it can get. Speaking of promotion, did I mention that:

    You’ll also now have access to a new set of promotional tools, starting with the option to promote your KDP Select-enrolled titles for FREE for up to 5 days every 90 days.

    I (of course) have several problems with this model.

    1) The Kindle Lending Library, for a start, is not like a real library. In a real library, the library purchases a copy of a book before making it available for lending. If ten district libraries buy your book, that’s ten little royalties accumulating in your account. Amazon does no such thing, not even bothering with a token payment while it introduces lending for all Prime members across the entire United States…that’s equivalent to how many libraries?

    You may say that that’s what the lending library fund is for but I note one thing. You’re not told what the expected uptake of the library is and you can’t tell me that Amazon hasn’t already crunched those numbers. Amazon has crunched numbers up its wazoo and, further, is extremely secretive about much that surrounds its Kindle. They know, but they’re not telling. That may be good business for them — and it is — but lack of such knowledge on which to base decisions is not good business for the average self-publisher.

    2) I went and read the actual terms and conditions and it’s not quite as KDP put it in their email. To reiterate, the KDP email says:

    When you make any of your titles exclusive to the Kindle Store for at least 90 days, those with US rights will automatically be included in the Kindle Owners’ Lending Library and can earn a share of a monthly fund.

    There are two implications to this statement:

    (a) That you only need to make your title exclusive to Kindle for 90 days, after which it’s automatically included in KDP Select; and

    (b) There is a way to be included in the Kindle library without signing up for KDP Select. Or, to put it another way, if you read an “automatically”, you’ll assume that there’s a “manual” option somewhere.

    You would be wrong on both counts. Once you move to the small print under “KDP Select Terms and Conditions” (the actual meat), you’ll note that the answer to 2(a) is:

    [Clause 3] Once you include a Digital Book in KDP Select, your Digital Book will be in KDP Select for a period of 90 days. Your Digital Book’s participation will automatically renew for additional 90-day periods, unless you opt out through the KDP website before renewal. [their emphasis]

    and

    [Clause 1] When you include a Digital Book in KDP Select, you give us the exclusive right to sell and distribute your Digital Book in digital format while your book is in KDP Select. During this period of exclusivity, you cannot sell or distribute, or give anyone else the right to sell or distribute, your Digital Book (or content that is reasonably likely to compete commercially with your Digital Book, diminish its value, or be confused with it), in digital format in any territory where you have rights. [my emphasis]

    Get that? Even “in any territory where you have rights“! Wow!

    So, from my reading, you are only eligible for the fund if you’re in KDP Select. And you are enrolled in KDP Select for 90-day periods. And, during those 90-day periods (auto-renewed for your convenience) you guarantee exclusivity of your title to the Kindle store. Opt out of KDP Select (i.e. sell your ebook outside of KDP) and you opt out of the fund.

    What about 2(b)? Say you still are interested in being part of the library initiative. How do you manually add your title to the library? Well, here’s where it gets tricky, because, according to the initial Kindle Direct Publishing conditions:

    5.2.2 Kindle Book Lending Program. The Kindle Book Lending program enables customers who purchase a Digital Book to lend it subject to limitations we establish from time to time. All Digital Books made available through the Program are automatically included in the Kindle Book Lending program. However, for Digital Books that are in the 35% Royalty Option (as described in the Pricing Page), you may choose to opt out of the Kindle Book Lending program. … Digital Books that are in the 70% Royalty Option (as described in the Pricing Page) cannot be opted out of the lending feature.

    So, as all the Sandal books are in the 70% category, it looks like I have no choice. I’m part of the Lending Library. (I cannot check this because, of course, being in Malaysia, I can’t buy a Kindle ebook or even see Kindle ebooks that are for sale.) But it looks like I won’t get a cut of cash because I’m not giving Amazon exclusivity to my titles.

    3) I don’t like this model because, being in Malaysia, I can’t buy a Kindle ebook or even see Kindle ebooks for sale. Yes, I know I said that before but it’s so important, I thought I’d repeat it.

    What Amazon is doing with this model is making sure that if you don’t have an Amazon in your immediate geographic region, you don’t see ebooks. Any ebooks. Why? Because Amazon will/wants to have all the ebooks locked up in an exclusivity cage called Kindle. This is far worse than the current ridiculous situation of geographic territories in print publishing, with US and UK editions of the same book (and, btw, confirms why Amazon didn’t introduce the EPUB format for new Kindles, which is what most people were expecting…they want to keep the garden walled, folks. Maybe Bezos is channelling Jobs?). We can get around those limitations currently via such places as The Book Depository and, yes, Amazon.

    But that’s the print side of the fence. On the digital side of the fence, Amazon/KDP is being nothing short of a ruthless, censoring bastard. It’s hobbling authors by making their books available through only one channel (Kindle) and it’s hobbling readers by making ebooks available through only one channel (Kindle).

    I think one reason Amazon is introducing KDP Select is because of Kobo. Early last month, Kobo was bought by Japanese web retailer, Ratuken. One pithy quote is:

    “We’ve got a shared vision,” said Kobo CEO Michael Serbinis on the same call, noting that this shared vision includes Rakuten’s current users, who he called “50 million potential Kobo customers around the world.” Source

    Kobo releases books in EPUB, the format that Amazon recently snubbed with release of the Kindle Fire, and I’m sure Amazon is betting that Rakuten and its deep experience in e-commerce won’t matter a damn if every North American title is locked up by the Kindle, as KDP Select will do.

    I can’t be a party to this. Amazon initially launched KDP using such buzzwords as “freedom” and “choice”. But, lest you forget, Amazon is a business and those words were only marketing-speak, as we are quite definitely finding out now.

    I am NOT signing up for the KDP Select program. I will not be taking a cut of thirty silver coins of the Kindle Lending Library fund. This may mean other self-publishers get a bigger slice of that pie. So be it.

  • Caught in a vortex of fear and loathing

    2

    Also apologies, but I’m running on blog empty here. In my defence, I am heavily into editing. I’ve made the changes that DevEd came back with and am now going over QUINTEN’S STORY again, to make sure the changes aren’t messing around with anything else and that they, and the rest of the book, are as smooth as I can make it.

    This is normally the time when I wonder why the damn hell I wrote the book in the first place, because all I can see are amateurish marks, turns of phrase that make me cringe, and other characteristics that make me think I’m looking at a page I wrote when I didn’t know how to (write, that is).

    I’ll get over it around the three-quarter mark. I usually do. But, in the meantime, every sentence, every paragraph is a potential guillotine victim.

    In this frame of mind, I’m sure you’ll understand if I stay mute for another week. Have a good one and hopefully I’ll have something more productive to say next Friday.